Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ᛯEichelhäher🜨's avatar

Well, there are some food net exporters in Africa but the FAO food insecurity map and Maplecroft's global map of food security paint a very different picture. The Ivory Coast for example exports coffee, cashews and rubber but imports rice and wheat.

There are about six African nations that reliably export staples. Six. Versus ~35-40 net importers (heavily dependent on rice, wheat, or maize imports). Do you see the problem?

There's also nothing hinting at an end to the ballooning of African populations.

Africa's population is projected to grow to 2.5 billion people by 2050 and 4 billion by 2100 with half of its population living in cities by 2030. How on earth are they supposed to be fine when they can't even feed their people now?

Fuel won't dry up overnight. Still, I agree that European nations are probably too caught up in the existing paradigm to switch to a more sustainable model. But over here, population pressures will decrease over the next two generations and Europe is more than capable to produce enough food even if the transition period will be rough. In the twenties and thirties Berlin was sustained more or less completely by its surrounding areas while having a larger population than today.

Of course living standards will have to be scaled shown significantly, while quality of life will go up (depending on who you ask).

ᛯEichelhäher🜨's avatar

"Once we calibrate the data from around a decade ago, today’s massive yields from synthetic fertilizers likely feed well over half the World."

An insane system, when one considers that literally billions of people live under conditions they couldn't ever sustain themselves. The moment food imports to Africa stop, hundreds of millions of people will die. If one looks up the relevant food security maps, there aren't many regions in the world that wouldn't see a massive die-off.

31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?